Change Log and Release Information

124

Comments

  • lillemakkenlillemakken Senior, senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (Geleia @ Nov 13 2009, 12:01 AM) »
    "reducing the archer defense"


    I got your point, but that made me smile smile.gif
    According to pvkii.com/forums,
    - Reaching enemies beyond your weapon model isn't a problem(you're just bad at dodging!)
    - Archer isn't overpowered
    - Higher post count is equivalent to higher skill, experience and knowledge in-game
  • -AOD- Bruce Campbell-AOD- Bruce Campbell Authorized Creator, Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (lillemakken @ Nov 12 2009, 12:41 PM) »
    I have somehing to share smile.gif

    First of all, I'm thinking by releasing one class, everyone will wait at spectator to get a spot into Vikings team smile.gif
    Secondly, I feel worried abut the big shining stars from a charged weapon. :S I know it's supposed to show players when the enemy have fully-charged their attack, but I don't know.
    I'm into a normal, realistic-looking medieval game and I can't stand big shiny unrealistic effects :S Is it possible to turn it off or something?

    P.S, The change with the crossbow; It now deals less damage when not aiming. Eh, is that just stupid unrealistic? Why would the crossbow cause less damage when not aiming?
    It's a piece of machinery. It's loaded by a bolt resting in a track with a very tense rope behind held idle by the metal trigger. Why did you make it this way? I just want to understand.

    I also have something nice to say. Lots of those changes are great smile.gif Very good work this time. PVKII will be forever changed by this. Thank you.
    I would rather have a balanced game than a realistic one. It works wonder for Team Fortress 2.
    image-1.gif
  • JezternzJezternz Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    If only tf2 was realistic sad.gif
  • lillemakkenlillemakken Senior, senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (-AOD- Bruce Campbell @ Nov 13 2009, 10:27 PM) »
    I would rather have a balanced game than a realistic one. It works wonder for Team Fortress 2.


    Realism is balance. Think of middle age. Middle age is in the past. The event is over and it existed.
    It is of course realistic because it happened from 1200- 1500. This is a wierd way to say this, but everything in middle age was "balanced" because it was realistic.

    Everything today is "Balanced" because it is realistic. You guys see my point? tongue.gif
    According to pvkii.com/forums,
    - Reaching enemies beyond your weapon model isn't a problem(you're just bad at dodging!)
    - Archer isn't overpowered
    - Higher post count is equivalent to higher skill, experience and knowledge in-game
  • ZinuXZinuX Mutated Walrus Hamster Members, Beta Tester
    edited November 2009
    Not really, modern weapons aren't really balanced. They are OP.
    Let's take the predator: Unmanned, practically invisible, deadly.
    And if they get taken down, it is only a loss of material.
    dragonattacksig04.pngrage.jpg
  • lillemakkenlillemakken Senior, senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (ZinuX @ Nov 14 2009, 03:05 PM) »
    Not really, modern weapons aren't really balanced. They are OP.
    Let's take the predator: Unmanned, practically invisible, deadly.
    And if they get taken down, it is only a loss of material.


    I ment today, real life. ^^ Not movies and science fiction.

    Like, take Kevlar vests, body armor, helmets and riot shields. Those items are doing the job pretty well against the weapons we have today.

    According to pvkii.com/forums,
    - Reaching enemies beyond your weapon model isn't a problem(you're just bad at dodging!)
    - Archer isn't overpowered
    - Higher post count is equivalent to higher skill, experience and knowledge in-game
  • SmackSmack Damn this compooter Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (lillemakken @ Nov 14 2009, 02:24 PM) »
    I ment today, real life. ^^ Not movies and science fiction.

    Like, take Kevlar vests, body armor, helmets and riot shields. Those items are doing the job pretty well against the weapons we have today.


    Just wait 'till they make non-newtonian fluid armour biggrin.gif
    Liquid body armour rocks!
    Wise Chinese proverb say "He who pays for porn has failed at life."

    image
  • BowrrlBowrrl Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (lillemakken @ Nov 14 2009, 03:24 PM) »
    I ment today, real life. ^^ Not movies and science fiction.

    Like, take Kevlar vests, body armor, helmets and riot shields. Those items are doing the job pretty well against the weapons we have today.


    Uhh... the Predator drone is completely real...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MQ-1_Predator

    I think Age of Chivalry is the game you're looking for (and im not trying to be a smartass or anything). Its more about being realistic, like CoD, (as far as video games go anyway) whereas PVKII is more about fun and being a caricature of its setting, like TF2.
  • ZinuXZinuX Mutated Walrus Hamster Members, Beta Tester
    edited 11:10AM
    The Predator has already killed the second and third in command of the Taliban.
    dragonattacksig04.pngrage.jpg
  • SkuzzlebuttSkuzzlebutt Buttskuzzle Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    ok this was mentioned some time ago....

    Pirate vikings and knights never lived in the same age....

    Realism gone

    Hello balance smile.gif
    A Signature
  • lillemakkenlillemakken Senior, senior
    edited 11:10AM
    I know they didn't live in the same time period.

    But my main-point was, that the crossbow shouldn't take less damage because you didn't aim with it. I think it's wierd :S

    So..
    According to pvkii.com/forums,
    - Reaching enemies beyond your weapon model isn't a problem(you're just bad at dodging!)
    - Archer isn't overpowered
    - Higher post count is equivalent to higher skill, experience and knowledge in-game
  • GeleiaGeleia ロリコン Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    think like that you do less damage because you can't hit your target like if you were aiming
    image
  • HeiHei and truly did she know the name of the Kong Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    but if the bolt hits the same place anyway..........



    QUOTE (Jezternz @ Nov 14 2009, 01:04 AM) »
    If only tf2 was realistic sad.gif


    It was originally going to be a realistic modern day shooter, sort of like BF2 but with a ninja class for some reason
  • GeleiaGeleia ロリコン Senior
    edited November 2009
    <!--quoteo(post=171924:date=Nov 14 2009, 08:10 PM:name=Hei
    image
  • ZinuXZinuX Mutated Walrus Hamster Members, Beta Tester
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (Skuzzlebutt @ Nov 14 2009, 05:44 PM) »
    Pirate vikings and knights never lived in the same age....

    Depends on how you see these teams, it could happen in the same area if you bend the definition a bit.
    Vikings were Pirates, and knights basically already existed in the Roman era (Equestrian order). So it could happen.
    In some sort of weird way.

    P.S. Yes, I know it didn't because with 'Pirates' we mean Caribbean Golden Age pirates. And with knights they mean almost late middle ages Knights. I just like to be a smartass.
    dragonattacksig04.pngrage.jpg
  • LordTrilobiteLordTrilobite Baron Grunwald disapproves. Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    In a lot of countries the time of the vikings is considdered part of the middle ages. I think pretty much only in the Brittanic isles and in Scandinavia, where it's labled as the dark ages or the age of the vikings.
    dragonattack_sig.jpg
  • lillemakkenlillemakken Senior, senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (LordTrilobite @ Nov 15 2009, 12:48 PM) »
    In a lot of countries the time of the vikings is considdered part of the middle ages. I think pretty much only in the Brittanic isles and in Scandinavia, where it's labled as the dark ages or the age of the vikings.


    That is right. Here in Norway we call it 'Viking tiden' Tid / Time. But the Viking Age was not at the same time as the middle ages, and it is wrong to consider it is.
    According to pvkii.com/forums,
    - Reaching enemies beyond your weapon model isn't a problem(you're just bad at dodging!)
    - Archer isn't overpowered
    - Higher post count is equivalent to higher skill, experience and knowledge in-game
  • LordTrilobiteLordTrilobite Baron Grunwald disapproves. Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    In Holland for example, there is no difference. So the middle ages then pretty much start right after the romans.

    In scandinavia you have the Vendel age, then Viking age, then the Middle age.
    dragonattack_sig.jpg
  • lillemakkenlillemakken Senior, senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (LordTrilobite @ Nov 15 2009, 03:12 PM) »
    In Holland for example, there is no difference. So the middle ages then pretty much start right after the romans.

    In scandinavia you have the Vendel age, then Viking age, then the Middle age.


    Well, I think if I ask all of my dutch online friends, they will say something else I believe ^^.

    Vendel age is called 'Iron age' or 'Jern Alderen' in Norway, so yeah. And yeah, the Iron age is going into the Viking era.
    Still, there is a difference between 800 - 1100 and 1200 - 1500 where England, Spain, France, etc was sending crusaders to Jerusalem and Europe had it's first pope.
    According to pvkii.com/forums,
    - Reaching enemies beyond your weapon model isn't a problem(you're just bad at dodging!)
    - Archer isn't overpowered
    - Higher post count is equivalent to higher skill, experience and knowledge in-game
  • F@G!F@G! Senior
    edited November 2009
    QUOTE (carlos @ Nov 9 2009, 04:59 AM) »
    your a gurl, you wouldnt know anything about climbing the ladders of power to exercise dominion over the weak and frail in order to upbraid the common morality of society and unleash your rule over those at your feet


    Your fucked up pervesity is disgusting.

    QUOTE (Bowrrl @ Nov 14 2009, 04:25 PM) »
    Uhh... the Predator drone is completely real...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MQ-1_Predator

    I think Age of Chivalry is the game you're looking for (and im not trying to be a smartass or anything). Its more about being realistic, like CoD, (as far as video games go anyway) whereas PVKII is more about fun and being a caricature of its setting, like TF2.


    Those who use Call of duty and realism in same sentence deserve to be crucified. I hate call of duty it is so overated :-/
  • BowrrlBowrrl Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (F@G! @ Nov 15 2009, 07:49 PM) »
    Those who use Call of duty and realism in same sentence deserve to be crucified. I hate call of duty it is so overated :-/


    VVV

    QUOTE (Bowrrl @ Nov 14 2009, 03:25 PM) »
    (as far as video games go anyway)


    My point was that CoD is based on features that exist in real life (which it does a horrible job of representing, but they are there nonetheless (Infinity Ward: "LOL Assault Rifles can supply better cover fire than Machine Guns and be more effective indoors than SMGs rite guyz?")), which can be likened to AoC and seems to be what the other guy was looking for.

    It is overrated, but I happen to like CoD more for the fact that it's a game that all my friends happen to have so I can play with them, more than the gameplay itself (which has almost cured me of bitching about people playing like dicks in PVKII... Dealing with the Dickery of MW2 then coming to PVKII is kind of like repeatedly hitting yourself in the face with a hammer to feel the luxury of getting kicked in the shin.).
  • LordTrilobiteLordTrilobite Baron Grunwald disapproves. Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    I tried CoC 4 once, it felt horribly clunky, because of the realism. Something like Counter Strike on the other hand, feels a lot nicer to play.
    dragonattack_sig.jpg
  • schatzmeisterschatzmeister PVKII Team, Beta Tester
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (LordTrilobite @ Nov 15 2009, 04:55 PM) »
    I tried CoC 4 once, it felt horribly clunky, because of the realism. Something like Counter Strike on the other hand, feels a lot nicer to play.


    What about Insurgency, I think it is a good mix between realism and gameplay...

    Will Turner: You didn't beat me. You ignored the rules of engagement. In a fair fight, I'd kill you.
    Jack Sparrow: That's not much incentive for me to fight fair, then, is it?

  • J-coJ-co Tramp Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    YAY IT'S BACK. RETURN OF THE PIRATE KITTEN...

    wub.gif
    wub.gif
    wub.gif
    guitarsmallb.jpg
    I have an aristocratic smile and like to punch people
  • HeiHei and truly did she know the name of the Kong Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    QUOTE (Schatzmeister @ Nov 15 2009, 02:31 PM) »
    What about Insurgency, I think it is a good mix between realism and gameplay...


    what he said
  • F@G!F@G! Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    Insurgency is hardcore dude.

    BF 2, Vietnam, 2142 &1942 suck ass as well. I hate the feeling and the slowness. Valves shooters are lightyears ahead.
  • HeiHei and truly did she know the name of the Kong Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    bf1942 is the best WWII shooter ever made

    If you don't find it fun, you're playing it wrong.


    Here's a helpful tip: on Operation Market Garden play as British and just drive a jeep up and down the bridge. Bots march in single file.
  • edited 11:10AM
    Medal Of Honor Allied Assault, it was a very good game, yet very different to other games, you could spin, lean to left or right, jump. shoot the Mother-Fucker down with a shotty.
    It required alot of skill to kill my own clanmembers because of the wallhack that everyone used, the game is very old, bad graphics and damn i've got great memories from that game.
  • HeiHei and truly did she know the name of the Kong Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    I never got around to playing it online, but that was one damn hard singleplayer. Sniper's Last Stand map took me ages

    makes any CoD game seem playable blindfolded
  • AmerikaAmerika Honkey Senior
    edited 11:10AM
    ANYWAYS BACK ON TOPIC

    I'm happy to see the objective based scoring finally being implemented. Even though it was mentioned before, it is nice to see it in the pictures, because I remember when it was mentioned and planned on being put in 2.0 but never was and that made me saaad. sad.gif
    imageI love eggs!
    QUOTE (Gee Hawd @ Nov 20 2007, 11:59 AM) »
    They're all transsexuals... but you wouldn't know that, YOU FAILED THE TEST


Sign In or Register to comment.